Do Alaska’s Representatives Care That Climate Change Is Wiping Out Alaskan Communities?

Recently on our Facebook page, we featured the incredibly sad story of the small village of Newtok, Alaska. This village of 350 Yupik Eskimos is being called the first American group of “climate refugees,” a community that will be forced to relocate because their ancestral home is expected to be underwater within four years due climate change.

FB Alaska post 6.15.13

The combination of rising sea levels, melting permafrost, flooding and erosion are destroying their village and their way of life. Other communities in Alaska are expected to face the same fate. If you think that this dire forecast would cause the state’s elected officials to spring into action, you are likely to be disappointed (but hopefully we can keep hope alive, too).

Rep. Don Young (R-At Large)

Alaska blog (2) 6.15.13

Alaska’s sole member of the House of Representatives, Don Young, has represented the state in Congress since 1973. His thoughts on climate change are summed up in the video above where he calls global warming “the biggest scam since Teapot Dome.” On his congressional website, his statements are slightly more evolved as he admits that climate change is occurring but refuses to attribute those changes to human activity. As you might imagine, he has consistently attempted to block action to address climate change or regulate carbon pollution.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R)

The state’s senior senator, who was reelected in 2010, is most well-known when it comes to climate-related action for her sponsorship of the 2010 Murkowski “Dirty Air Act.” The Murkowski resolution would have officially disapproved of the EPA’s “endangerment finding,” the agency’s scientific determination that greenhouse gases endanger public health. If Murkowski’s resolution had succeeded, EPA would have been barred from using the Clean Air Act to address greenhouse gases. EPA would not have been able to work with the Department of Transportation to reduce vehicle pollution and make cars and trucks more efficient and would have been barred any efforts to reduce or limit carbon pollution from power plants. Luckily, the Murkowski resolution failed.

Since then, Murkowski has given us hints that all hope might not be lost. Earlier this year, Murkowski said in an interview that climate change is “real” and “we need to fight it.”

Sen. Mark Begich (D)

Begich, who is up for reelection in 2014, is perhaps the best hope for communities like Newtok that are threatened by climate change. Shortly after his election in 2008, Begich took a group of senators on a “climate change tour” to highlight the effects already being experienced in his state. The tour included a stop in Newtok.

Begich opposed his colleague’s Dirty Air Act, opposed an amendment from Senator Mitch McConnell that would have hamstrung EPA’s carbon efforts, and has spoken positively about the need for federal action to address climate change.

***

As you can see, the range of views in Alaska’s congressional delegation is nearly as vast as the state itself. In a state that is rich in the fossil fuel resources that cause climate change, it’s no surprise that views on the issue are complex. However, as the soon-to-be-former residents of Newtok can tell you, this issue strikes at the heart of the state’s identity and cannot be put off much longer.

What America Can Learn from New Mexico

Today U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-New Mexico) stood on the floor of the Senate and delivered his first speech as the newly elected Senator from New Mexico. The first floor speech for any member of Congress is a monumental occasion and sets the course for his or her term of office. While Senator Heinrich had a plethora of topics to choose from, he chose to focus on energy and climate change and how his state has and will shape our future.

Not Surprised

Senator Heinrich is a champion for conservation and energy innovation. We knew that when we supported him in his bid for the U.S. Senate in the 2012 election. So today’s speech came as no surprise to us at the Action Fund.

Senator Heinrich shared many of these thoughts with the Action Fund when he sat down for an interview for our Running Clean: Good Policy, Good Politics report and video series.

Heinrich_interview1

(Click on picture to view video)

In his interview Senator Heinrich said, “I think it’s important for people to realize that this new cleaner energy economy is coming. And it’s not only critical to addressing climate change, but there are going to be winners and losers within that economy. And there are going to be people and countries who lead and there will be other countries that are going to be following and catching up. I want to make sure that not only New Mexico, but the United States is a leader in that. That we realize the jobs and the layers of jobs from the people who manufacture these technologies to the people who install it, to the people who maintain these technologies. You want to maximize your economic impact as part of this new economy by having all of those things done here. We need to move our energy portfolio in a cleaner, more domestic direction over time. It’s not about being right; it’s about moving the country forward.”

New Mexico as National Leader

In his speech today, Senator Heinrich spoke to the fact that New Mexico has built its economy around innovation and technology. Collaborations between the state’s national labs, research universities, defense installations and private sector companies have created jobs and lead the way on developing new frontiers.

He went on to remind everyone that while we are entitled to our own set of opinions, none of us are entitled to our own set of facts, especially in the context of climate change. He urged the Senate to better use facts, data and science to address the challenges we are facing as a nation as our climate continues to change. And in a bold statement, he called on his fellow Senate members to think big and to commit to solving climate change within the decade.

Refreshing

In today’s political environment, isn’t it refreshing to see a candidate elected on his principles and then sticking to them once they arrive in Washington, DC? Senator Heinrich is part of a new crop of leaders from a state ready to lead on progressive energy and climate policy that will protect our health, environment and create jobs. This type of courageous and inspiring leadership will be our nation’s path to energy and climate security and economic prosperity.

 

 

Tags: , , , ,  

Snyder On the Right Side of Renewables in Michigan

Many times I find myself writing my blog posts about politicians who stand with dirty polluters rather than the health and well being of their constituents. Today is an exception.

In case you missed it on the NRDC Action Fund Facebook page or Twitter feed, Michigan Governor Rick Snyder recently told the Associate Press that he supports increasing his state’s investment in renewable energy sources.

I’m going to go ahead and just state the obvious. This is a big deal! As we fight to keep existing renewable energy portfolios in place at statehouses all across the country, Governor Snyder is choosing the road less traveled. Rather than attacking a plan already in place, he’s decided to enhance it.

In Michigan, energy suppliers must produce at least 10 percent of their electricity from renewable sources by 2015. With major energy providers on target to meet the deadline, Governor Snyder is right to advance the discussion about how Michigan can and should do more.

Jobs

Michigan is a state built on a manufacturing base. That economic engine was hit especially hard during the recent economic downturn. But it’s not all doom and gloom. According to the American Wind Energy Association, Michigan already has more than 40 wind manufacturing facilities currently operating. Michigan also ranks #17 in the country as a wind resource, which is enough wind to power 160 percent of the state’s current electricity needs.

According to a report from the Environmental Law & Policy Center, Michigan is home to more than 120 solar supply chain businesses employing more than 6,300 people. This places Michigan #4 in the nation for total solar jobs. And, there’s still room to grow, with an estimated of 3,500 total gigawatts of solar power able to be harnessed.

Standing with Michiganders

Governor Snyder not only recognizes the economic potential of investing more heavily in renewable energy, he also sees what his constituents want for Michigan. In polling leading up to the 2012 election, the majority of Michigan voters supported increasing the state’s investment in renewable energy.

While some opponents of renewable energy may try to paint a different picture due to the defeat of past pro-renewables campaigns at the ballot box, it’s simply not the case. Evidence following the election clearly showed that it was the approach to changing the constitution that caused the issue to be defeated. Michiganders support for renewable energy remains strong. By supporting an increase in the renewable energy standards, Governor Snyder is on the right side of his constituents.

 Winning

I’ve talked a lot about creating situations that result in win-wins and even win-win-wins. Increasing renewable energy investments is Michigan is one of those cases. Governor Snyder is on the right path and I would encourage the other elected officials in the state to get on board. Together they can create jobs, improve public health and protect our beloved Great Lakes. The future is bright for Michigan. Let’s see how the state’s leaders harness it.

 

Senator Lautenberg’s Legacy and His Successor

America lost a champion of public health and environmental protection when Senator Frank Lautenberg passed away on Monday. All of us benefited from his accomplishments, even if we never lived in his home state of New Jersey. Lautenberg helped create smoke-free workplaces, tough drunk driving laws, and the right to know what kind of chemicals we are exposed to—concepts that most Americans now take for granted.

What no one can take for granted, however, is who will replace Lautenberg in the Senate.

Appointing a successor after the death of an elected official is never simple. Each state has its own set of rules, and each appointment is guided by local politics. But in New Jersey, the process is further complicated by conflicting laws and bad timing.

The rules on the books say that an empty congressional seat must be filled by the governor’s appointee until the next statewide election. According to one provision in the law, that would be this November when New Jersey voters return to the polls for the gubernatorial race.

But another provision says this sequence only works when the vacancy occurs 70 days before the primary, and New Jersey held its primary on Tuesday—the day after Lautenberg died. If the state follows that rule, the appointee would hold the position until the next primary and election cycle, 17 months from now in November 2014 (The Cook Political Report has a good summary of the legal issues, but subscription required).

The confusion in the law gives Governor Chris Christie some flexibility and on Tuesday he announced that the special election would be October 16th and the primary will be on August 13th. This plan will resolve the question of succession quickly, but it could also open Christie to some tricky political problems.

Some are questioning why Christie would spend taxpayer money for an election when there is already a statewide vote scheduled less than a month after this race.  Theories as to why he scheduled a separate election differ. Some say he decided for a different path than outlined in the divergent laws in order to avoid a lawsuit. Others say he doesn’t want Democratic hopeful Cory Booker on the same ballot as his gubernatorial re-election because it might cause a heavy Democratic turnout.

Whatever your theory,  Governor Christie has a unique leadership style that appeals to some Democrats and Independents. But in the end he is still a Republican and he will probably choose a Republican to replace Senator Lautenberg in the interim. After all, the New Jersey GOP hasn’t had a Republican Senator since Richard Nixon was in the White House and the Poseidon Adventure was in movie theaters. This is an opportunity to update the party’s presence in the Garden State.

But having a special election this year is also a good thing for Democrats since it is likely that a Republican caretaker in the seat wouldn’t have time to build inroads in a way that would make him or her difficult to beat.

Experts from both parties are busy weighing the odds and mapping out legal strategy, and of course recruiting candidates. But no matter who gets appointed or when the special election takes place, there is something we must not forget: Senator Lautenberg’s legacy.

New Jersey has a proud history of supporting a leader who puts public health first. In his effort to protect people from dangerous chemicals and hold polluters accountable for their mess, Lautenberg created the nation’s toxic right-to-know law, established the U.S. Chemical Safety board, and helped craft the Superfund Law. His sister died from asthma several decades ago, and he became a tireless advocate for clean air standards. He was also dismayed by the thousands of toxic chemicals Americans are exposed to every day in our food and household products, and just last month he introduced a bipartisan bill to strengthen the nation’s chemical safety laws.

Things like toxic chemicals and dirty air don’t observe party lines. They endanger Republicans and Democrats alike, and the safeguards Lautenberg put in place protect all American families equally. Hopefully, no matter who fills his seat or when, the next Senator from New Jersey will do the same.

 

Wind Power Creates Jobs, Saves Money

You recently saw on our  Facebook page, some important clean energy news. MidAmerican Energy Company announced plans to invest $1.9 billion in wind energy projects in Iowa. The power company plans to install 656 wind turbines throughout the state, adding 1,050 megawatts of wind generation.

Blog fb graphic Iowa wind

This clean energy investment will:

  • Create jobs: Create 460 construction jobs over two years and 48 permanent jobs.
  • Save money: Is expected to cut consumer rates by $3.3 million in 2015, growing to $10 million annually by 2017.
  • Benefit farmers and the state: Landowners that allow turbines on their land will be paid $3.2 million annually and the state is expected to generate more than $360 million in additional property tax revenues over the next 30 years.
  • Attract businesses: Facebook recently chose to locate a new data center in Iowa, in part because the company wants to meet its goal of getting 25% of its power from clean sources.

It’s no wonder that clean energy enjoys such strong support when projects like this are creating jobs, attracting investment, saving consumers money and reducing pollution. More than 70% of Americans support expanding wind power and a whopping 85% of Iowans see wind energy as a positive for the state.

Smart politicians of both parties have already seen that running on an overwhelmingly popular issue like wind power can contribute to winning campaigns. In our Running Clean report, we describe the way that President Obama campaigned on wind energy during the 2012 election. He cited his support for federal tax incentives for wind energy (and his opponent’s opposition to them) during stump speeches, in a television ad and in a special website dedicated to Iowa wind. Conservative Republicans in the state like Rep. Steve King and Rep. Tom Latham took the same position as the president, supporting wind energy and even urging Mitt Romney to change his mind. On election day, the President won the state by 6 points.

Romney ad blog graphic

While some Members of Congress and other Washington insiders may think of clean energy as a wedge issue, the news out of the heartland shows that isn’t the case on the ground. In the real world, clean energy is creating jobs and saving consumers money. And those are concepts that voters in both parties can agree on.

Tags: , ,  
View all Updates RSS | Subscribe via Email