Clean Energy Champ Triumphs, Energy Issues Front and Center in 2012

The NRDC Action Fund may start sounding like a broken record, but we just can’t help ourselves! As we’ve said here before, there is power in running on clean energy. Not that we ever considered you doubted us, but just in case, here are two new examples which prove our point.

Just yesterday in the 17th Congressional District primary in Pennsylvania, clean energy champ Matt Cartwright triumphed over fossil fuel candidate Tim Holden. The League of Conservation Voters invested in a significant television commercial which highlighted Rep. Holden’s support of big oil energy policies.

Pennsylvania primary voters showed us exactly what we’ve been seeing all across the country. Clean energy presents candidates with a positive, solutions-based narrative to talk about issues that matter most to Americans: jobs, the economy, gas prices, and the health of their families.

Still don’t believe that energy, environment and health issues are going to be front and center in 2012?
In an interview published yesterday in Rolling Stone, President Obama said,

“I suspect that over the next six months, this is going to be a debate that will become part of the campaign, and I will be very clear in voicing my belief that we’re going to have to take further steps to deal with climate change in a serious way. That there’s a way to do it that is entirely compatible with strong economic growth and job creation – that taking steps, for example, to retrofit buildings all across America with existing technologies will reduce our power usage by 15 or 20 percent. That’s an achievable goal, and we should be getting started now.”

So, even if we are starting to sound like a broken record, we know that the tune we’re playing is a hit song. Feel free to start humming along.

Tags: ,  

The Attack on the Environment Must Stop by Bob Deans

Since Republicans gained control of the U.S. House of Representatives following the 2010 elections, the body has waged the single worst legislative assault in history against the foundational safeguards we all depend on to protect our environment and health.

In little more than a year, the GOP-led House has voted more than 200 times to undermine existing protections or to weaken, delay or block new measures we need to defend clean air, waters, wildlife and lands.

In lopsided votes before committees and on the full floor of the House, Republicans have been joined by a handful of Democrats, mostly from fossil fuel producing states, to sustain this relentless and reckless campaign.

The votes have targeted foundational protections like the Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act, created over the past four decades by Republicans and Democrats in both houses of Congress.

They’ve gone after needed public investment in energy efficiency and the renewable power technologies of tomorrow, including support for programs set up by President George W. Bush to promote American innovation.

They’ve undermined the Environmental Protection Agency, created by Richard Nixon, and its authority to hold polluters to account.

And they’ve threatened iconic places from the Great Lakes to the Gulf of Mexico, from the Appalachian Mountains to the Chesapeake Bay, turning away from the national wildlife and preservation legacy first enshrined more than a century ago by President Theodore Roosevelt.

All that stands between the nation and the dark vision behind these destructive votes is a Senate that has voted down or so far ignored the worst impulses of the House.

The effort to eviscerate our environmental safety net is not about jobs, as its proponents claim. It’s about putting polluter profits first — and putting the rest of us at risk.

Government regulations of all kinds account for less than 1 percent of all large layoffs, according to exhaustive data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Decades of experience make clear that our economy has been strengthened by efforts to keep our workers healthy and our environment clean. And investing in renewable power and the next generation of energy-efficient cars, homes and workplaces is helping to put Americans back to work while reducing our reliance on foreign oil.

These goals don’t divide us by party; they unite us as a nation.

That explains why the American people didn’t ask for this unconscionable assault, but someone else did: the fossil fuel industry and other top-line polluters that spend hundreds of millions of dollars each year lobbying our officials in Washington and bankrolling the campaign war chests of any candidate willing to carry a smokestack agenda up on Capitol Hill.

These corporate polluters have the right to be heard. The rest of us have an obligation to speak up for ourselves about what’s best for the country. Eight in ten Americans want our environmental safeguards strengthened or left alone, according to a February Pew Research Center poll. We need to stand up and say so.

We’ve come a long way since the first Earth Day in 1970, but our job’s not done. Not when a copper mine in Alaska can still threaten one of the world’s great salmon grounds. Not when a renegade oil well can still put the Gulf of Mexico at risk. Not when communities across the country are terrified by hydraulic fracturing. Not when thousands of our children suffer from asthma aggravated by air pollution. And not when the ravages of climate change reach deeper into our lives every day.

Neither political party can empower this country to address these challenges alone.

Safeguarding our future is bipartisan work, as leaders from both parties have long understood.

We can debate how best to do that, just as we have in the past. But this is no time to turn our backs on four decades of environmental progress made by Republicans and Democrats alike, working together, when leaders of vision and courage from both parties stood up for nature and put into place the responsible public oversights we all depend on to protect our environment and health. It’s time, instead, to honor that shared legacy, make good on the debt we owe to our children and rebuild the bipartisan majority for our environment.

Bob Deans, of the NRDC Action Fund, is the author of Reckless: The Political Assault on the American Environment.

 

Chairman Whitfield Admits Anti-Environment Energy Bills Won’t Lower Gas Prices

We’ve heard the lie that environmental protections are raising gas prices again and again. However, one House Republican was recently (and perhaps unintentionally) honest about the true impact of the Tea Party’s anti-environmental agenda.

“I don’t think any of us have said that our bill would reduce costs,” stated Energy and Power Subcommittee Chairman Rep. Ed Whitfield.  As Rick Perry might say: “Oops.”

In fact, many members of the Tea Party have said that their bills to rollback environmental protections would reduce costs. The Ranking Democrat on the Energy and Commerce Committee has helpfully remixed some of these repeated assertions into a short video.

If, as the subcommittee chairman said, these bills won’t lower gas prices, what will they do? They will stop EPA from implementing parts of the Clean Air Act at dirty refineries. They will stop EPA from making fuels cleaner. They will stop EPA from updating clean air standards that reduce smog. And they’d undermine the heart of the Clean Air Act by forcing EPA to deviate from decades of success in only considering health when setting certain pollution standards.

 Once again the Tea Party shows its true colors by putting polluter profits ahead of people’s health.

 

Tags: , ,  

New Poll: Energy to be “Very Important” to Voters in November

With the contestants in November’s presidential election now apparently set, voters are beginning to think about what will be important to them in choosing a commander in chief. A new poll out this week from the Pew Research Center found that 61% of respondents ranked energy as “very important” to their decision.

As the NRDC Action Fund’s Running Clean report showed, clean energy presents candidates with a positive, solutions-based narrative to talk about issues that matter most to Americans: jobs, the economy, gas prices, and the health of their families.

With President Obama and Governor Romney running neck in neck according to the same poll, clean energy provides an opportunity for the President to distinguish himself and win over voters who care about reducing our dependence on oil, improving our national security and building a new economy based on the American spirit of innovation.

As the campaign heats up, we’ll continue to follow the way these “very important” energy issues are playing here on the stump and on the airwaves here on the blog and on our Facebook page. We hope you’ll join us.

Tags: , , ,  

Tea Partiers Are Destroying the Legacy of the Republican Party 

A new book out this week presents an astounding fact that could help shape the upcoming elections: the Republican-led House voted nearly 200 times to undermine public health and environmental safeguards in 2011.

This constitutes the largest attack on environmental protections in our nation’s history. But the American people didn’t ask for such a radical departure. Eight out of ten voters want the standards that keep our water clean and our air safe to breathe either strengthened or left alone.

Reckless: The Political Assault on the American Environment chronicles the Tea-Party-inspired attempt to strip away trusted safeguards. Written by Bob Deans, a veteran journalist who now works for the NRDC Action Fund, the book describes the damage these measures would do and the polluting companies they would benefit.

But the book also provides something else: a valuable insert to a 2012 campaign playbook.

Anyone running in a primary or race against a Tea-Partier or those who have voted with them should shine a spotlight on their radical environmental assault. They can remind voters that when the economy was in flames and Americans were losing their homes, these lawmakers spent their time trying to dismantle environmental laws that have stood strong for 40 years.

Instead of addressing the global financial crisis an unregulated mortgage debt, leaders like House Majority Leader Eric Cantor claimed that the Environmental Protection Agency and its public health safeguards were the “job destroying” villains.

Challengers can also remind voters that the Republication war against environmental protection is bad for our health.

Reckless describes how Tea Party House members tried time and again to gut the Clean Air Act. This isn’t some obscure, bureaucratic regulation. It is the law that has prevented more than 4,300,000 premature deaths since 1990. It’s the law that slashed the number of unhealthy air days in Los Angeles from more than 200 days in 1970 down 28 days in 2003. It’s the law that brought the percentage of American children with dangerous levels of lead in their blood down from 90 percent in the 1970s to 2 percent in 2000. And it’s the law that has had decades of bipartisan support.

But the Leadership of the House Republicans wanted to halt this progress and return us to darker, dirtier days. Challengers can offer voters a clear contrast: clean skies and healthier families or more smog and asthma attacks? I can’t think of one parent who wants their kids breathing more pollution.

Challengers—especially those going after moderate voters—should remind Americans of something else as well: the Republican Party didn’t always put polluters first. Reckless charts the GOP’s proud tradition of conservation from President Teddy Roosevelt to President George H.W. Bush—the man who called the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 one of his greatest legislative accomplishments. Most Republican voters continue to hold these values even if their lawmakers have set them aside: 58 percent of Republican voters said they oppose House efforts to block the EPA from reducing air pollution from power plants, according to a 2011 poll by GS Strategy Group and Hart Research.

Why have so many House lawmakers forgotten that conservation is part of conservative values? I see two reasons. First, the Tea Party scared the daylights out of moderate Republicans and even out of sensible conservatives.

And second, polluters spend a lot of cash in Washington. Reckless reports that people and organizations associated with the oil and gas industry spent $31.8 million on campaign contributions during the 2010 congres­sional elections, with 77 percent of the money going to Republicans.

Polluters may have piles of money, but candidates who stand for ordinary Americans and offer a vision of a cleaner, healthier future can mobilize voters better than any corporate-funded rally can. NRDC Action Fund’s research shows that promoting a clean energy vision can help candidates win elections. In this election cycle, candidates should remind voters how hard Tea Party Republicans worked to take away that cleaner future.

Americans of both parties want their kids to breathe safe air and drink clean water. To make sure we deliver on that promise, we must all do our part to end the House Republicans’ historic assault on environmental protections.

 

 

Tags: , , , , ,  
View all Updates RSS | Subscribe via Email